By Brandon C. Welsh, David P. Farrington
Crime prevention could be rational and will be in line with the very best facts. Decision-makers should still weigh seriously any on hand facts on what works top. How can a application that has produced no discernable facts of effectiveness, as proven via various reviews, be thought of for implementation? regrettably, this occurs forever. Evidence-based crime prevention makes an attempt to beat this and different hindrances by means of making sure that the simplest on hand facts is taken into account in any choice to enforce a software designed to avoid crime. This booklet is ready evidence-based crime prevention.
A venture of the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice staff, combating Crime brings jointly the top clinical proof on what works top for quite a lot of interventions prepared round 4 very important domain names in criminology: at-risk youngsters, offenders, sufferers, and locations. it's the first publication to evaluate the effectiveness of criminological interventions utilizing the main rigorous assessment technique of the systematic assessment. it truly is an integral consultant to the prime clinical proof on what works top to avoid crime.
Read or Download Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places PDF
Similar criminology books
Expert tools and methods for info and intelligence collecting. .. now published that you should use. you can now discover whatever you must learn about someone you need to learn about fulfill your want to know with those revealing expert manuals on research, crime and police sciences.
For twelve years Robert Blecker, a legal legislations professor, wandered freely inside of Lorton primary felony, armed in simple terms with cigarettes and a tape recorder. The demise of Punishment assessments criminal philosophy opposed to the truth and knowledge of road criminals and their guards. a few killers' poignant conditions may still lead us to mercy; others convey truly why they need to die.
Restorative justice is likely one of the so much referred to themes within the box of felony justice, more and more emphasised when it comes to younger offenders. Many see it additionally as a paradigm shift in felony justice, clear of dominant punitive and healing paradigms, emphasizing as a substitute the reintegration of offenders and capability offenders into their groups.
- Treating the Criminal Offender
- Women at the Wall: A Study of Prisoners’ Wives Doing Time on the Outside
- Exploring Criminal and Illegal Enterprise: New Perspectives on Research, Policy and Practice
- Learning from Error in Policing: A Case Study in Organizational Accident Theory
Additional info for Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places
John Horwood. 1998. Early Conduct Problems and Later Life Opportunities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39:1097–1108. , and Bryan R. Loney. 1999. ’’ In Handbook of Disruptive Behavior Disorders, edited by Herbert C. Quay and Anne. E. Hogan, 507–524. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. , Patti L. Culross, and Richard E. Behrman. 1999. Home Visiting: Recent Program Evaluations-Analysis and Recommendations. Future of Children 9: 4–26. , Carol S. Larson, Eugene M. Lewit, and Richard E. Behrman.
Intergenerational Transfer of Psychosocial Risk in Women with Childhood Histories of Aggression, Withdrawal, or Aggression and Withdrawal. Developmental Psychology 34: 1246–1262. Tremblay, Richard E. 2000. The Development of Aggressive Behaviour During Childhood: What Have We Learned in The Past Century? International Journal of Behavioral Development 24: 129–141. ——, Linda Kurtz, Louise C. Maˆsse, Frank Vitaro, and Robert O. Pihl. 1995. A Bimodal Preventive Intervention for Disruptive Kindergarten Boys: Its Impact Through Mid-Adolescence.
In high-risk groups, however, the programs do have an impact that can be demonstrated in evaluations of indicated prevention. Again, these ﬁndings on prevention are in line with research on delinquency treatment in which high-risk samples showed larger eﬀects (Lipsey and Wilson, 1998). As a consequence for policymaking, one can suggest a program focus on groups that are already on the track to antisocial behavior. , LeBlanc, 1998; Lo¨sel, 2002), risk-focused programs may also be more adequate to ensure suﬃcient treatment intensity.