System of assessment of students in the university

System of assessment of students in the university

Generally in most higher education institutions all over the world, they normally use a system that is four-point evaluating students’ knowledge, skills and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.

Comprehending the meaning of points

The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who has got found comprehensive, systematic and knowledge that is deep the capability to individually perform the tasks given by this program, familiar with the primary and extra literature, suggested by this system. Such an evaluation also involves the mastering associated with the relationship amongst the fundamental principles of discipline and their significance when it comes to acquired occupation.

The evaluation “good” sets the pupil who may have learned the academic and system product in complete, successfully fulfills the program’s tasks, worked out of the literature that is main by the program. That is, students who may have shown the systematic nature of discipline knowledge and it is effective at self-replenishment and updating in the act of further academic work and professional task.

The grades “satisfactory” deserve students who has got discovered the information associated with the basic material that is educational the degree needed for further training and future operate in a profession, effective at performing the tasks given to because of the system, acquainted with the primary literary works suggested by this program. This assessment is presented to students who have made flaws in the answer to the exam and in the performance of the exam assignments, but have demonstrated the ability to eliminate them as a rule.

The assessment is “unsatisfactory” when it comes to student who has got knowledge of gaps which have led to fundamental errors when you look at the utilization of the tasks given to by the system, this is certainly, a student that is not able to carry on education or begin expert tasks after graduation without additional training in the discipline that is relevant.

Shortcomings of four-point evaluation rating and system system

A four-way system for evaluating students’ knowledge, skills and abilities calls for significant enhancement or replacement. Its main drawbacks are: insufficient inspiration for the determination of academic and intellectual task, since it is targeted on getting a minimum of knowledge (“made up” – “did not make up”); made for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity into the evaluation of pupil’s knowledge; inconsistency because of the college system, which pupils used as former pupils, etc.

Along with the four-point conventional system of assessment of students’ knowledge, the score system of assessment, which will be on the basis of the accumulation of grades for a specific amount of study (module, semester, 12 months, whole term of training) for an extensive academic and cognitive activity, is now ever more popular. The sum these assessments functions as an indicator that is quantitative of quality of academic and intellectual task of this student when comparing to the successes of their other students.

The rating system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, abilities and abilities is dependent on the principles that are following

  • each discipline that is academic the pupil’s work with its mastering is examined into the credit devices, the quantity of that is dependant on the score;
  • the record associated with the student’s current work needs to be held, that is reflected within the evaluation that is finalin the units of credits);
  • the peculiarities of teaching different subjects (complexity, importance of control when you look at the curriculum) are considered, this is certainly, the complexity factor (significance);
  • availability of several types of control (outgoing, current, intermediate, final);

The pupil rating for the semester or year is understood to be the arithmetic that is average of rating for every control.

To implement a score system for evaluating pupils’ knowledge, specific conditions are very important: the readiness of instructors and students to perceive them; proper organizational and methodological help, in specific, separate work of students is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the shape of unique tables; application of written verification of knowledge, etc.

Recent Posts